Diane has asked me why I don't post my photos larger. Partly it's because the template I use needed stretching as larger pictures lap over the sidebar. (I've done that now). Also, I have a very large screen on my iMac so I can view a whole photo even if it's quite large. But I'm not sure what the effect is when you have a laptop with a much smaller screen. Can people view a large image in its entirety? I don't know if there's any advantage to posting large if it means people can't see the whole image at once. The size Diane uses is comfortable on my screen but sometimes those Karen and Carolina (for example) use fill my whole screen. What do they look like on a smaller screen? I've never viewed a blog on a laptop - does what you see adjust to the size of screen? What I mean is, do my usual pictures look very small on a small screen or do they look the same size as they look on my large screen (about 10x8 cm)? I'm not very techy-minded. Am I missing something here?
I have put today's picture again at the larger size here - which on my screen is 16x12 cm. And I can see the whole picture but only about 4 or 5 lines of accompanying text. What does this look like to you?
And does it matter to you whether you only see a photo and have to scroll to read the accompanying words - or do you prefer to be able to look and read at the same time?